What's your biggest QA challenge right now?
Pick the one that fits best. We'll customize your results.
AI Code Risk
Our team is using AI coding tools and I'm not sure our quality and governance are keeping up.
Release Quality
Bugs are escaping to production, releases are slow, and QA is eating our dev team's time.
Hardware & Firmware
We're shipping physical hardware or firmware and need real-device testing.
Board / Leadership Case
I need to measure our AI investment ROI or make a business case for QA to leadership.
AI Code Governance Assessment
How long has your team been actively using AI coding tools: Cursor, Copilot, Claude Code, or similar?
Just getting started
Less than 6 months
Moderate adoption
6–18 months
Deep adoption
It's a core part of how we ship (18+ months)
AI Code Governance Assessment
How large is your engineering team today?
Fewer than 5 developers
5–12 developers
13–30 developers
30+ developers
AI Code Governance Assessment
Has your board, CFO, or executive leadership started asking about AI investment ROI or quality risk?
Yes, it's already on the agenda
Not yet, but I expect it within the next two quarters
No, this is proactive
AI Code Governance Assessment
How open is your organization to sharing code or project data with an outside QA partner?
This helps us recommend the right audit tier. All Outpost engagements use read-only access and auto-expiring credentials.
Not open
I'd prefer a leadership-only conversation
Read-only access to project tools
Jira, Sentry, dashboards
We can export specific code samples or PR diffs
Fine with full read-only repository access via SSO
QA Partnership Assessment
What type of product is your team building?
Web application or SaaS platform
Mobile app (iOS and/or Android)
Both web and mobile
API or backend services primarily
QA Partnership Assessment
How large is your engineering team today?
Fewer than 5 developers
5–12 developers
13–30 developers
30+ developers
QA Partnership Assessment
What's driving the most pain right now?
Bugs keep escaping to production
Releases are delayed by manual testing
Developers are spending too much time coordinating QA
We have no real QA coverage, we're flying blind
QA Partnership Assessment
What does your QA setup look like today?
We use an hourly offshore vendor and it's not working
We have an in-house QA team but need to scale
QA is handled by developers, no dedicated function
No QA at all currently
Hardware QA Assessment
Where are you in your hardware product lifecycle?
Pre-launch
We haven't shipped to customers yet
Post-launch
Shipped and need ongoing QA coverage
Mid-cycle
OTA firmware updates or companion app features in progress
Hardware QA Assessment
How large is your engineering team?
Fewer than 5 developers
5–12 developers
13–30 developers
30+ developers
Hardware QA Assessment
What's your biggest hardware QA concern?
Pre-launch device validation
Real-world, not emulators
Firmware OTA update safety
Companion app stability on iOS and Android
AI-generated firmware or companion app code
I'm not sure how to govern it
QA Investment Assessment
Who is the primary audience for this conversation?
Our CFO or finance leadership
I need to quantify the ROI
Our board or shareholders
I need a board-ready report
I'm the decision-maker
I need to evaluate Outpost as a vendor
QA Investment Assessment
What's driving the business case?
Measuring whether our AI tooling investment delivered what we expected
Board or shareholder questions about AI quality risk
Headcount decisions justified by AI productivity claims
Legal or compliance exposure from AI-generated code
Pure QA cost reduction
Our current setup is too expensive
QA Investment Assessment
Which best describes your organization?
Series A or B
Series C or later / Pre-IPO
Public company
Enterprise (1,000+ employees)